Evidence shows Black,
Latino, and Native American youth are significantly more likely than their
other students to be referred to administration for disciplinary action and
receive out-of-school suspension or expulsion.1-5 Moreover, this
type of exclusionary discipline significantly impacts these youths’
trajectories; students who have been suspended or expelled are more likely to be
held back a grade, leave school, and become involved in the criminal justice
system.6-8 Given these
findings, DPS underwent a major policy overhaul in 2008, with the goal of
reducing the use of exclusionary discipline.
The new policy encourages schools to implement proactive and preventive
interventions such as restorative approaches to resolving discipline problems.
Although initial evidence suggested success in reducing suspensions and
expulsions, researchers discovered that racial disparities continue to exist in
school discipline outcomes. To address this issue, the Graduate School of
Social Work at the University of Denver (DU) partnered with the Division of
Student Services of Denver Public Schools (DPS) in fall 2012 to examine racial
disparities in suspensions and expulsions. Over the summer of 2013, the
partners submitted a proposal to the Institute of Education Science (IES) for funding
to support the team’s efforts to generate new knowledge that can inform
district policies and practices aimed at reducing racial disparities in
exclusionary school discipline.
Research Questions and Methods
To address the
aforementioned areas of inquiry, members of the partnership will focus on three
major research questions:
- What multilevel risk and protective factors contribute to racial disproportionality in office discipline referrals and exclusionary discipline sanctions?
- What malleable school-level factors differentiate schools with high and low racial disproportionalities in exclusionary discipline sanctions?
- Are student academic outcomes related to racial disproportionality in school discipline?
The researchers will
primarily rely on secondary data analysis of administrative data and census
tract information, including student records, school climate surveys, and
school performance framework files. The sample will include all K-12 students
enrolled in DPS schools between 2008 and 2014.
Future Goals
The
current proposal sought funding to continue an early-stage partnership addressing
racial disparities in school discipline and their prevention. In order
to achieve buy-in from the varied and numerous stakeholders involved, this
partnership must demonstrate that disparate disciplinary action results in
disparate outcomes for both the individual student as well as overall student
body outcomes. The authors propose capacity building activities to include
researcher-practitioner partnership meetings, stakeholder engagement
activities, advisory board meetings, and district decision-making activities.
As this particular partnership moves forward, it will follow an iterative research-to practice cycle, engaging
stakeholders in each stage.
Citation
Anyon, Y., Jenson, J., Altschul, I., McQueen, J., Farrar,
J., Greer, E., Simmons, J., & Downing, B. Submitted to the Institute of
Educational Sciences. A
researcher-practitioner partnership to eliminate racial disparities in school
discipline. July 2014-June 2015 (400,000)
For More Information
For a more in-depth look at
the IES proposal, including researcher hypotheses and ongoing challenges, contact Dr. Yolanda Anyon.
References
1 Hannon, L., DeFina, R., & Bruch, S.
(in press). The relationship between skin
tone and school suspension for African Americans.
2 Krezmien, M. P., Leone, P. E., &
Achilles, G. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide
practices and reporting. Journal of
Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217-226.
3 Payne, A. A., & Welch, K. (2010).
Modeling the effects of racial threat on punitive and restorative school
discipline practices. Criminology, 48,
1019.
4 Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung,
C.-G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral:
A national investigation of African American and latino disproportionality in
school discipline. School Psychology
Review, 40, 85-107.
5 Wallace Jr, J. M., Goodkind, S.,
Wallace, C. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender
differences in school discipline among us high school students: 1991-2005. The Negro Educational Review, 59, 47.
6 Fabelo, T., Thompson, M. D., Plotkin,
M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks III, M. P., & Booth, E. A. (2011). Breaking schools' rules: A statewide study
of how school discpline relates to students' success and juvenile justice
involvement. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center and The
Public Policy Research Institute of Texas A&M University.
7 Rausch, M. K., Skiba, R. J., &
Simmons, A. B. (2004). The academic cost of discipline: The relationship
between suspension/expulsion and school achievement. Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, School of Education,
Indiana University.
8 Skiba, R. J., Simmons, A., Staudinger, L.,
Rausch, M., Dow, G., & Feggins, R. (2003). Consistent removal: Contributions of school discipline to the
school-prison pipeline. Paper presented at the School to Prison Pipeline
Conference, Boston, MA.
No comments:
Post a Comment